Julius Caeser Argumentative Essay
In his speech, Brut us proved the better of the two when employing logos e says, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? ” (Act 3, Scene 2, Page 2 ) This sentence puts a powerful image inside the listeners’ heads, making them see themselves eves and their families as slaves under the iron fist of Caesar, had he still lived. This image is enough h for anyone to find justification In the assassination of their emperor.
Now, in Antonym SP each he mentions how ransom money collected from prisoners Caesar held went to the state. Not for his arsenal gain (AY, SO, PI), but while humble, the state of Rome would remain unchanged De after such act, the poor would still be poor and the rich would still be rich, not much off r season to raise the pitchforks towards the conspirators. We do, however, must credit Antonym for his strong position on ethos. In his oration, he turns the crowd against Brutes with lines such as. He was my friend, faithful and Jus t to me, but Brutes is an honorable man. ” (AY, SO, PI) Antonym repeats the second half of that line t wrought is speech, ever so slightly questioning It, and getting the audience to do the same, In turn having them join his side. Brutes’ equivalent was lackluster in comparison, almost as if he is a poor salesman, he says, “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect for mine honor that you may ply by saying, ‘Trust me on this. In the field of ethos, Antonym comes out on top. Third and finally, each speakers utilization of pathos, using emotions to your advent Here, both Antonym and Brutes use pathos strongly. At first glance, when Antonym says, ” My heart s in the coffin with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me,” (AY, SO, AS) you a struck, as the crowd is, with empathy for Antonym, but that does not leave no room for Brutes to capture their hearts.
Brutes declares his intentions saying, “It is not that I loved Cases AR less, but that I love Rome more. ” (AY, SO) I interpret this as the people of the revilement rep sensing Rome, and with that, Brutes’ declaration is, in a way, flattering the crowd, going on the idea that they are more willing to agree with someone who has established a respect for them, marred to a more selfish method executed by Antonym.
The two prove strong in pat hose, but Brutes is victorious by way of blushing his audience’s cheeks. In short, Antonym has thwarted Brutes in taking the crowd by ethos, but Brutes took it home with logos and pathos, using the ability to plant an unsettling image in his lists nerds mind, justifying himself, and flattering his audience, subconsciously making them more ease lay agree with his claims. Overall, Brutes has emerged the winner of rhetorical strategy in his s peach.